Real HardwareApril 2026

Hardware Validation

We ran real circuits on 5 quantum devices from 3 vendors, spanning both superconducting and trapped-ion architectures. Here's how our predictions held up against actual hardware.

0.96
Pearson r
0.92
0.096
RMSE
15
Pairs

Predicted vs. Observed Fidelity

0.000.000.250.250.500.500.750.751.001.00Predicted FidelityObserved Fidelity
IBM (uncalibrated)
IQM (calibrated)
IonQ (calibrated, trapped-ion)
Perfect prediction

All 15 Circuit-Device Pairs

CircuitDeviceVendorPredictedObservedΔCalibration
4Q GHZibm_fezIBM0.73110.8738+0.143None
4Q GHZibm_kingstonIBM0.81720.9675+0.150None
4Q GHZibm_marrakeshIBM0.73560.9404+0.205None
4Q VQE Ansatzibm_fezIBM0.28480.2849+0.000None
4Q VQE Ansatzibm_kingstonIBM0.45940.2783-0.181None
4Q VQE Ansatzibm_marrakeshIBM0.28240.2742-0.008None
4Q Deep Ladderibm_fezIBM0.25960.2778+0.018None
4Q Deep Ladderibm_kingstonIBM0.39620.4780+0.082None
4Q Deep Ladderibm_marrakeshIBM0.23450.2908+0.056None
4Q GHZiqm_garnetIQM0.86580.8870+0.021Adaptive
4Q VQE Ansatziqm_garnetIQM0.52900.5300+0.001Adaptive
4Q Deep Ladderiqm_garnetIQM0.37920.3740-0.005Adaptive
4Q GHZionq_forteIonQ0.86670.9530+0.086Adaptive
4Q VQE Ansatzionq_forteIonQ0.53200.5620+0.030Adaptive
4Q Deep Ladderionq_forteIonQ0.38270.3620-0.021Adaptive

Same-Vendor Accuracy

On IBM hardware (3 devices, 9 pairs), predictions achieve r = 0.96 with no device-specific tuning. The physics model works directly from public Metriq benchmark data.

Superconducting Cross-Vendor

On IQM Garnet, stale benchmark data caused over-prediction. One-shot adaptive calibration recovered accuracy to Δ = 0.001 on out-of-sample circuits — a 94% RMSE reduction.

Trapped-Ion Cross-Vendor

On IonQ Forte (trapped-ion), the same calibration protocol generalized: RMSE dropped 82% and out-of-sample VQE matched within 3 percentage points. Architecture-agnostic.

Data from real hardware experiments on IBM Quantum Platform and AWS Braket, April 2026. IonQ Forte accessed via AWS Braket Hybrid Jobs (priority queue).